**Geodesy** is a Julia package for working with points in various world and
local coordinate systems. The primary feature of *Geodesy* is to define and
perform coordinate transformations in a convenient and safe framework,
leveraging the *CoordinateTransformations* package.
Transformations are accurate and efficient and implemented in native Julia code
(with many functions being ported from Charles Karney's *GeographicLib*
C++ library), and some common geodetic
datums are provided for convenience.

Lets define a 3D point by its latitude, longitude and altitude (LLA):

```
x_lla = LLA(-27.468937, 153.023628, 0.0) # City Hall, Brisbane, Australia
```

This can be converted to a Cartesian Earth-Centered-Earth-Fixed (ECEF) coordinate simply by calling the constructor

```
x_ecef = ECEF(x_lla, wgs84)
```

Here we have used the WGS-84 ellipsoid to calculate the transformation, but other
datums such as `osgb36`

, `nad27`

and `grs80`

are provided. All transformations
use the *CoordinateTransformations*' interface, and the above is short for

```
x_ecef = ECEFfromLLA(wgs84)(x_lla)
```

where `ECEFfromLLA`

is a type inheriting from *CoordinateTransformations*'
`Transformation`

. (Similar names `XfromY`

exist for each of the
coordinate types.)

Often, points are measured or required in a *local* frame, such as the north-east-up
coordinates with respect to a given origin. The `ENU`

type represents points in this
coordinate system and we may transform between ENU and globally referenced
coordinates using `ENUfromLLA`

, etc.

```
origin_lla = LLA(-27.468937, 153.023628, 0.0) # City Hall, Brisbane, Australia
point_lla = LLA(-27.465933, 153.025900, 0.0) # Central Station, Brisbane, Australia
# Define the transformation and execute it
trans = ENUfromLLA(origin_lla, wgs84)
point_enu = trans(point_lla)
# Equivalently
point_enu = ENU(point_enu, point_origin, wgs84)
```

Similarly, we could convert to UTM/UPS coordinates, and two types are provided
for this - `UTM`

stores 3D coordinates `x`

, `y`

, and `z`

in an unspecified zone,
while `UTMZ`

includes the `zone`

number and `hemisphere`

bool (where `true`

=
northern, `false`

= southern). To get the canonical zone for your coordinates,
simply use:

```
x_utmz = UTMZ(x_lla, wgs84)
```

If you are transforming a large number of points to or from a given zone, it may
be more effective to define the transformation explicitly and use the lighter
`UTM`

storage type.

```
points_lla::Vector{LLA{Float64}}
utm_from_lla = UTMfromLLA(56, false, wgs84) # Zone 56-South
points_utm = map(utm_from_lla, points_lla) # A new vector of UTM coordinates
```

*Geodesy* becomes particularly powerful when you chain together transformations.
For example, you can define a single transformation from your data on disk in UTM
coordinates to a local frame in ENU coordinates. Internally, this will perform
UTM (+ zone) → LLA → ECEF → ENU via composing transformations with `∘`

into a
`ComposedTransformation`

:

```
julia> origin = LLA(-27.468937, 153.023628, 0.0) # City Hall, Brisbane, Australia
LLA(lat=-27.468937°, lon=153.023628°, alt=0.0)
julia> trans = ENUfromUTMZ(origin, wgs84)
(ENUfromECEF(ECEF(-5.046925124630393e6, 2.5689157252069353e6, -2.924416653602336e6), lat=-27.468937°, lon=153.023628°) ∘ (ECEFfromLLA(wgs84) ∘ LLAfromUTMZ(wgs84)))
```

This transformation can then be composed with rotations and translations in
*CoordinateTransformations* (or your own custom-defined `AbstractTransformation`

to define further reference frames. For example, in this way, a point measured
by a scanner on a moving vehicle at a particular time may be globally
georeferenced with a single call to the `Transformation`

!

Finally, the Cartesian distance between world points can be calculated via automatic transformation to a Cartesian frame:

```
x_lla = LLA(-27.468937, 153.023628, 0.0) # City Hall, Brisbane, Australia
y_lla = LLA(-27.465933, 153.025900, 0.0) # Central Station, Brisbane, Australia
distance(x_lla, y_lla) # 401.54 meters
```

(assuming the `wgs84`

datum, which can be configured in `distance(x, y, datum)`

).

This section describes some terminology and concepts that are relevant to
*Geodesy.jl*, attempting to define Geodesy-specific jargon where possible. For
a longer, less technical discussion with more historical context, ICSM's
Fundamentals of Mapping page
is highly recommended.

A position on the Earth can be given by some numerical coordinate values, but
those don't mean much without more information. The extra information is called
the **Coordinate Reference System** or **CRS** (also known as a *Spatial
Reference System* or SRS). A CRS tells you two main things:

- The measurement procedure: which real world objects were used to
define the frame of reference or
*datum*of the measurement? - The
*coordinate system*: how do coordinate numerical values relate to the reference frame defined by the datum?

The full specification of a CRS can be complex, so a short label called a
**Spatial Reference IDentifier** or **SRID** is usually used instead. For
example, EPSG:4326 is one way to refer to the 2D WGS84
latitude and longitude you'd get from a mobile phone GPS device. An SRID
is of the form `AUTHORITY:CODE`

, where the code is a number and the authority is
the name of an organization maintaining a list of codes with associated CRS
information. There are services where you can look up a CRS, for example,
http://epsg.io is a convenient interface to the SRIDs maintained by the
*European Petroleum Survey Group* (EPSG) authority. Likewise,
http://spatialreference.org is an open registry to which anyone can
contribute.

When maintaining a spatial database, it's typical to define an internal list of SRIDs (effectively making your organization the authority), and a mapping from these to CRS information. A link back to a definitive SRID from an external authority should also be included where possible.

In spatial measurement and positioning, a **datum** is a set of reference
objects and assigned coordinates *relative to which* other objects may be
positioned. For example, in traditional surveying a datum might comprise a
pair of pegs in the ground, separated by a carefully measured distance. When
surveying the position of an unknown but nearby point, the angle back to the
original datum objects can be measured using a theodolite. After this, the
relative position of the new point can be computed using simple triangulation.
Repeating this trick with any of the now three known points, an entire
triangulation network of surveyed objects can be extended outward. Any point
surveyed relative to the network is said to be measured *in the datum* of the
original objects. Datums are often named with an acronym, for example OSGB36 is
the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain, 1936.

In the era of satellite geodesy, coordinates are determined for an object
by timing signals from a satellite constellation (eg, the GPS satellites) and
computing position relative to those satellites. Where is the datum here? At
first glance the situation seems quite different from the traditional setup
described above. However, the satellite positions as a function of time
(*ephemerides*, in the jargon) must themselves be defined relative to some
frame. This is done by continuously observing the satellites from a set of
highly stable ground stations equipped with GPS receivers. It is the full set of
these ground stations and their assigned coordinates which form the datum.

Let's inspect the flow of positional information in both cases:

- For traditional surveying,
`html datum object positions -> triangulation network -> newly surveyed point`

- For satellite geodesy,
`html datum object positions -> satellite ephemerides -> newly surveyed point`

We see that the basic nature of a datum is precisely the same regardless of whether we're doing a traditional survey or using a GPS receiver.

Coordinates for new points are measured by transferring coordinates from the datum objects, as described above. However, how do we decide on coordinates for the datum objects themselves? This is purely a matter of convention, consistency and measurement.

For example, the **International Terrestrial Reference System** (**ITRS**) is a
reference system that rotates with the Earth so that the average velocity of
the crust is zero. That is, in this reference system the only crust movement is
geophysical. Roughly speaking, the *defining conventions* for the ITRS are:

- Space is modeled as a three-dimensional Euclidean affine space.
- The origin is at the center of mass of the Earth (it is
*geocentric*). - The z-axis is the axis of rotation of the Earth.
- The scale is set to 1 SI meter.
- The x-axis is orthogonal to the z-axis and aligns with the international reference meridian through Greenwich.
- The y-axis is set to the cross product of the z and x axes, forming a right handed coordinate frame.
- Various rates of change of the above must also be specified, for example, the scale should stay constant in time.

The precise conventions are defined in chapter 4 of the
IERS conventions
published by the International Earth Rotation and Reference Service (IERS).
These conventions define an ideal reference *system*, but they're useless
without physical measurements that give coordinates for a set of real world
datum objects. The process of measuring and computing coordinates for datum
objects is called *realizing* the reference system and the result is called a
*reference frame*. For example, the **International Terrestrial Reference Frame
of 2014** (**ITRF2014**) realizes the ITRS conventions using raw measurement
data gathered in the 25 years prior to 2014.

To measure and compute coordinates, several space geodesy techniques are used to gather raw measurement data; currently the IERS includes VLBI (very long baseline interferometry) of distant astronomical radio sources, SLR (satellite laser ranging), GPS (global positioning system) and DORIS (gosh these acronyms are tiring). The raw data is not in the form of positions, but must be condensed down in a large scale fitting problem, ideally by requiring physical and statistical consistency of all measurements, tying measurements at different sites together with physical models.

In geometry, a **coordinate system**
is a system
which uses one or more numbers, or **coordinates** to uniquely
determine the position of a point in a mathematical space such as Euclidean
space. For example, in geodesy a point is commonly referred to using geodetic
latitude, longitude and height relative to a given reference ellipsoid; this is
called a **geodetic coordinate system**.

An **ellipsoid** is chosen because
it's a reasonable model for the shape of the Earth and its gravitational field
without being overly complex; it has only a few parameters, and a simple
mathematical form. The term **spheroid**
is also used because the ellipsoids in use today are rotationally symmetric
around the pole. Note that there's several ways to define
latitude on an ellipsoid. The most
natural for geodesy is **geodetic latitude**, used by default because it's
physically accessible in any location as a good approximation to the angle
between the gravity vector and the equatorial plane. (This type of latitude
is not an angle measured at the centre of the ellipsoid, which may be surprising
if you're used to spherical coordinates!)

There are usually several useful coordinate systems for the same space. As well as the geodetic coordinates mentioned above, it's common to see

- The x,y,z components in an Earth-Centred Cartesian coordinate system rotating
with the Earth. This is conventionally called an
**Earth-Centred Earth-Fixed**(**ECEF**) coordinate system. This is a natural coordinate system in which to define coordinates for the datum objects defining a terrestrial reference frame. - The east,north and up
**ENU**components of a Cartesian coordinate frame at a particular point on the ellipsoid. This coordinate system is useful as a local frame for navigation. - Easting,northing and vertical components of a
**projected coordinate system**or**map projection**. There's an entire zoo of these, designed to represent the curved surface of an ellipsoid with a flat map.

Different coordinates systems provide different coordinates for the same point,
so it's obviously important to specify exactly which coordinate system you're
using. In particular, you should specify which ellipsoid parameters are in
use if you deal with latitude and longitude, as in principle you could have more
than one ellipsoid. This is a point of confusion, because a datum in geodesy
also comes with a reference ellipsoid as a very strong matter of convention
(thus being called a **geodetic datum**).

With its conventional ellipsoid, a geodetic datum also defines a conventional geodetic coordinate system, thus bringing together concepts which are interconnected but conceptually distinct. To emphasize:

- A coordinate system is a mathematical abstraction allowing us to manipulate
*geometric*quantities using numeric and algebraic techniques. By itself, mathematical geometry is pure abstraction without a connection to the physical world. - A datum is a set of physical objects with associated coordinates, thereby
*defining*a reference frame in a way which is physically accessible. A datum is the bridge which connects physical reality to the abstract ideal of mathematical geometry, via the algebraic mechanism of a coordinate system.

Geodesy provides several in-built coordinate storage types for convenience and
safety. The philosophy is to avoid carrying around raw data in generic containers
like `Vector`

s with no concept of what coordinate system it is in.

`LLA{T}`

- latitude, longitude and altitudeThe global `LLA`

type stores data in a lat-lon-alt order, where latitude and longitude
are expected in degrees (not radians). A keyword constructor, `LLA(lat=x, lon=y, alt=z)`

,
is also provided to help with having to remember the storage order.

`LatLon{T}`

- latitude and longitudeThe 2D `LatLon`

type stores data in a lat-lon order, where latitude and longitude
are expected in degrees (not radians). A keyword constructor, `LatLon(lat=x, lon=y)`

,
is also provided. `LatLon`

is currently the only supported 2D coordinate.

`ECEF{T}`

- Earth-centered, Earth-fixedThe global `ECEF`

type stores Cartesian coordinates `x`

, `y`

, `z`

, according to the
usual convention. Being a Cartesian frame,
`ECEF`

is a subtype of StaticArrays'
`StaticVector`

and they can be added and subtracted with themselves and other
vectors.

`UTM{T}`

- universal transverse-MercatorThe `UTM`

type encodes the easting `x`

, northing `y`

and height `z`

of a UTM
coordinate in an unspecified zone. This data type is also used to encode
universal polar-stereographic (UPS) coordinates (where the zone is `0`

).

`UTMZ{T}`

- universal transverse-Mercator + zoneIn addition to the easting `x`

, northing `y`

and height `z`

, the global `UTMZ`

type
also encodes the UTM `zone`

and `hemisphere`

, where `zone`

is a `UInt8`

and
`hemisphere`

is a `Bool`

for compact storage. The northern hemisphere is
denoted as `true`

, and the southern as `false`

. Zone `0`

corresponds to the UPS
projection about the corresponding pole, otherwise `zone`

is an integer between
`1`

and `60`

.

`ENU{T}`

- east-north-upThe `ENU`

type is a local Cartesian coordinate that encodes a point's distance
towards east `e`

, towards north `n`

and upwards `u`

with respect to an
unspecified origin. Like `ECEF`

, `ENU`

is also a subtype of `StaticVector`

.

Geodetic datums are modelled as subtypes of the abstract type `Datum`

. The
associated ellipsoid may be obtained by calling the `ellipsoid()`

function, for
example, `ellipsoid(NAD83())`

.

There are several pre-defined datums. Worldwide datums include

`WGS84`

- standard GPS datum for moderate precision work (representing both the latest frame realization, or if time is supplied a discontinuous dynamic datum where time looks up the frame implementation date in the broadcast ephemerides.)`WGS84{GpsWeek}`

- specific realizations of the WGS84 frame.`ITRF{Year}`

- Realizations of the International Terrestrial Reference System for high precision surveying.

National datums include

`OSGB36`

- Ordnance Survey of Great Britain of 1936.`NAD27`

,`NAD83`

- North American Datums of 1927 and 1983, respectively`GDA94`

- Geocentric Datum of Australia, 1994.

Datums may also be passed to coordinate transformation constructors such as
transverse-Mercator and polar-stereographic projections in which case the
associated ellipsoid will be extracted to form the transformation. For datums
without extra parameters (everything except `ITRF`

and `WGS84{Week}`

) there is a
standard instance defined to reduce the amount of brackets you have to type.
For example, `LLAfromECEF(NAD83())`

and `LLAfromECEF(nad83)`

are equivalent.

*Geodesy* provides two interfaces changing coordinate systems.

"Transformations" are based on *CoordinateTransformations* interface for defining
`AbstractTransformation`

s and allow the user to apply them by calling them,
invert them with `inv()`

and compose them with `compose()`

or `∘`

. The transformations
cache any possible pre-calculations for efficiency when the same transformation
is applied to many points.

"Conversions" are based on type-constructors, obeying simple syntax like `LLA(ecef, datum)`

.
The `datum`

or other information is *always* necessary, as no assumptions are
made by *Geodesy* for safety and consistency reasons. Similarly, `Base.convert`

is not defined because, without assumptions, it would require additional
information. The main drawback of this approach is that some calculations may not
be pre-cached (for instance, the origin of an ENU transformation).

`LLA`

and `ECEF`

The `LLAfromECEF`

and `ECEFfromLLA`

transformations require an ellipsoidal datum
to perform the conversion. The exact transformation is performed in both directions,
using a port the ECEF → LLA transformation from *GeographicLib*.

Note that in some cases where points are very close to the centre of the ellipsoid,
multiple equivalent `LLA`

points are valid solutions to the transformation problem.
Here, as in *GeographicLib*, the point with the greatest altitude is chosen.

`LLA`

and `UTM`

/`UTMZ`

The `LLAfromUTM(Z)`

and `UTM(Z)fromLLA`

transformations also require an
ellipsoidal datum to perform the conversion. The transformation retains a cache
of the parameters used in the transformation, which in the case of the
transverse-Mercator projection leads to a significant saving.

In all cases zone `0`

corresponds to the UPS coordinate system, and the
polar-stereographic projection of *GeographicLib* has been ported to Julia to
perform the transformation.

An approximate, 6th-order expansion is used by default for the transverse-Mercator
projection and its inverse (though orders 4-8 are defined). The algorithm is a
native Julia port of that used in *GeographicLib*, and is accurate to nanometers
for up to several UTM zones away from the reference meridian. However, the
series expansion diverges at ±90° from the reference meridian. While the `UTMZ`

-methods
will automatically choose the canonical zone and hemisphere for the input,
extreme care must be taken to choose an appropriate zone for the `UTM`

methods.
(In the future, we implement the exact UTM transformation as a fallback —
contributions welcome!)

There is also `UTMfromUTMZ`

and `UTMZfromUTM`

transformations that are helpful
for converting between these two formats and putting data into the same `UTM`

zone.

`ENU`

framesThe `ECEFfromENU`

and `ENUfromECEF`

transformations define the transformation
around a specific origin. Both the origin coordinates as an `ECEF`

as well as
its corresponding latitude and longitude are stored in the transformation for
maximal efficiency when performing multiple `transform`

s. The transformation can
be inverted with `inv`

to perform the reverse transformation with respect to the
same origin.

Many other methods are defined as convenience constructors for composed transformations, to go between any two of the coordinate types defined here. These include:

`ECEFfromUTMZ(datum) = ECEFfromLLA(datum) ∘ LLAfromUTMZ(datum)`

`UTMZfromECEF(datum) = UTMZfromLLA(datum) ∘ LLAfromECEF(datum)`

`UTMfromECEF(zone, hemisphere, datum) = UTMfromLLA(zone, hemisphere, datum) ∘ LLAfromECEF(datum)`

`ECEFfromUTM(zone, hemisphere, datum) = ECEFfromLLA(datum) ∘ LLAfromUTM(zone, hemisphere, datum)`

`ENUfromLLA(origin, datum) = ENUfromECEF(origin, datum) ∘ ECEFfromLLA(datum)`

`LLAfromENU(origin, datum) = LLAfromECEF(datum) ∘ ECEFfromENU(origin, datum)`

`ECEFfromUTMZ(datum) = ECEFfromLLA(datum) ∘ LLAfromUTMZ(datum)`

`ENUfromUTMZ(origin, datum) = ENUfromLLA(origin, datum) ∘ LLAfromUTMZ(datum`

`UTMZfromENU(origin, datum) = UTMZfromLLA(datum) ∘ LLAfromENU(origin, datum)`

`UTMfromENU(origin, zone, hemisphere, datum) = UTMfromLLA(zone, hemisphere, datum) ∘ LLAfromENU(origin, datum)`

`ENUfromUTM(origin, zone, hemisphere, datum) = ENUfromLLA(origin, datum) ∘ LLAfromUTM(zone, hemisphere, datum)`

Constructor-based transforms for these are also provided, such as `UTMZ(ecef, datum)`

which converts to `LLA`

as an intermediary, as above. When converting multiple
points to or from the *same* ENU reference frame, it is recommended to use the
transformation-based approach for efficiency. However, the other
constructor-based conversions should be similar in speed to their transformation
counterparts.

Currently, the only defined distance measure is the Cartesian distance,
`distance(x, y, [datum = wgs84])`

, which works for all combinations of types for
`x`

and `y`

- except that the UTM zone and hemisphere must also be provided
for `UTM`

types, as in `distance(utm1, utm2, zone, hemisphere, [datum = wgs84])`

(the Cartesian distance for `UTM`

types is not approximated, but achieved via
conversion to `ECEF`

).

This is the only function currently in
*Geodesy* which takes a default datum, and *should* be relatively accurate for
close points where Cartesian distances may be most important. Future work
may focus on geodesics and related calculations (contributions welcome!).

01/19/2015

5 days ago

71 commits