An interface for tables in Julia



The Tables.jl package provides simple, yet powerful interface functions for working with all kinds tabular data through predictable access patterns.

    Tables.rows(table) => Rows
    Tables.columns(table) => Columns

Where Rows and Columns are the duals of each other:

  • Rows is an iterator of property-accessible objects (any type that supports propertynames(row) and getproperty(row, nm::Symbol)
  • Columns is a property-accessible object of iterators (i.e. each column is an iterator)

In addition to these Rows and Columns objects, it's useful to be able to query properties of these objects:

  • Tables.schema(x::Union{Rows, Columns}) => Union{Tables.Schema, Nothing}: returns a Tables.Schema object, or nothing if the table's schema is unknown
  • For the Tables.Schema object:
    • column names can be accessed as a tuple of Symbols like sch.names
    • column types can be accessed as a tuple of types like sch.types
    • See ?Tables.Schema for more details on this type

A big part of the power in these simple interface functions is that each (Tables.rows & Tables.columns) is defined for any table type, even if the table type only explicitly implements one interface function or the other. This is accomplished by providing performant, generic fallback definitions in Tables.jl itself (though obviously nothing prevents a table type from implementing each interface function directly).

With these simple definitions, powerful workflows are enabled:

  • A package providing data cleansing, manipulation, visualization, or analysis can automatically handle any number of decoupled input table types
  • A tabular file format can have automatic integration with in-memory structures and translation to other file formats

Tables Interface

So how does one go about satisfying the Tables.jl interface functions? It mainly depends on what you've already defined and the natural access patterns of your table:


  • Tables.istable(::Type{<:MyTable}) = true: this provides an explicit affirmation that your type implements the Tables interface

To support Rows:

  • Define Tables.rowaccess(::Type{<:MyTable}) = true: this signals to other types that MyTable supports valid Row-iteration
  • Define Tables.rows(x::MyTable): return a Row-iterator object (perhaps the table itself if already defined)
  • Define Tables.schema(Tables.rows(x::MyTable)) to either return a Tables.Schema object, or nothing if the schema is unknown or non-inferrable for some reason

To support Columns:

  • Define Tables.columnaccess(::Type{<:MyTable}) = true: this signals to other types that MyTable supports returning a valid Columns object
  • Define Tables.columns(x::MyTable): return a Columns, property-accessible object (perhaps the table itself if it naturally supports property-access to columns)
  • Define Tables.schema(Tables.columns(x::MyTable)) to either return a Tables.Schema object, or nothing if the schema is unknown or non-inferrable for some reason

Sinks (transferring data from one table to another)

Another question is how MyTable can be a "sink" for any other table type. The answer is quite simple: use the interface functions!

  • Define a function or constructor that takes, at a minimum, a single, untyped argument and then calls Tables.rows or Tables.columns on that argument to construct an instance of MyTable

For example, if MyTable is a row-oriented format, I might define my "sink" function like:

function MyTable(x)
    Tables.istable(x) || throw(ArgumentError("MyTable requires a table input"))
    rows = Tables.rows(x)
    sch = Tables.schema(rows)
    names = sch.names
    types = sch.types
    # custom constructor that creates an "empty" MyTable according to given column names & types
    # note that the "unknown" schema case should be considered, i.e. when `sch.types => nothing`
    mytbl = MyTable(names, types)
    for row in rows
        # a convenience function provided in Tables.jl for "unrolling" access to each column/property of a `Row`
        # it works by applying a provided function to each value; see `?Tables.eachcolumn` for more details
        Tables.eachcolumn(sch, row) do val, col, name
            push!(mytbl[col], val)
    return mytbl

Alternatively, if MyTable is column-oriented, perhaps my definition would be more like:

function MyTable(x)
    Tables.istable(x) || throw(ArgumentError("MyTable requires a table input"))
    cols = Tables.columns(x)
    # here we use Tables.eachcolumn to iterate over each column in a `Columns` object
    return MyTable(collect(propertynames(cols)), [collect(col) for col in Tables.eachcolumn(cols)])

Obviously every table type is different, but via a combination of Tables.rows and Tables.columns each table type should be able to construct an instance of itself.

Functions that input and output tables:

For functions that input a table, perform some calculation, and output a new table, we need a way of constructing the preferred output table given the input. For this purpose, Tables.materializer(table) returns the preferred sink function for a table (Tables.columntable, which creates a named tuple of AbstractVectors, is the default).

Note that an in-memory table with a properly defined "sink" function can reconstruct itself with the following:



For example, we may want to select a subset of columns from a column-access table. One way we could implement it is with the following:

function select(table, cols::Symbol...)
    Tables.istable(table) || throw(ArgumentError("select requires a table input"))
    nt = Tables.columntable(table)  # columntable(t) creates a NamedTuple of AbstractVectors
    newcols = NamedTuple{cols}(nt)

# Example of selecting columns from a columntable
tbl = (x=1:100, y=rand(100), z=randn(100))
select(tbl, :x)
select(tbl, :x, :z)

tbl = [(x=1, y="a", z=1.0), (x=2, y="b", z=2.0)]
select(tbl, :z, :x)

First Commit


Last Touched

about 16 hours ago


80 commits